Kid Chan – Interview di NST

11 08 2008

By : FRANCIS DASS

Kid Chan

Kid Chan

AS a child, Kid Chan recalls that he had always loved looking at photographs.

Even then, Chan had discovered that photos, be they of Princess Diana Spencer (1961-1997) or Mother Teresa (1910-1997), could be powerful and impactful.

It is not surprising then that, though his path towards a career in photography has been a wee bit circuitous, he has managed to make this port of call (career-wise, anyway!) on what surely looks like his calling.

Born and raised in Kuala Lumpur, his childhood was an ordinary one, with the possible exception of his fascination with photographs (he would go to bookshops and look at photographs in magazines).
The 30-year old wunderkind went to the Sri Cempaka School in Kuala Lumpur before furthering his studies at Curtin University of Technology in Australia, where he got his Bachelor of Commerce degree in International Business.

When he returned to Kuala Lumpur after graduation, he worked as a personal assistant to Datuk M.S. Tan, founder of the Metropolitan College Group.

In this position, at age 22, Chan interacted with high-flying business figures and members of society.

Reflecting on those good old days, he says: “I learnt a lot about how one should carry oneself when meeting VIPs.”

He learnt plenty about how to manage a business, and gleaned sartorial acumen, from Tan.

After spending two years as a PA, Chan decided to join a photo studio and worked as an apprentice there.

“I worked there long enough to wash their toilet and paint the wall,” he says cryptically.

Now, Chan is an established name in the Malaysian photography scene, in wedding and corporate photography.

Just last month alone, he travelled to Singapore, Bangkok, Kuching and Sydney for photo shoots, mostly weddings.

And the months ahead are looking busy too. He has a very important wedding shoot coming up in Italy in August.

During the interview, Chan refused to reveal whose wedding it will be (because of the non-disclosure agreement he’d signed with the parties), but there have been news reports in the local dailies that celebrity Maya Karin will marry Englishman Steven David Shorthose in Italy in August. Ahem.

Of his early days as a photographer, Chan recalls that he started out using a manual camera.

“My first camera was a Nikon F90X. Today, I am using a Leica M8 digital camera,” he says.

And he has never stopped learning about his craft. He still consults his sifu T.S. Lim, an avid photographer, who is an expert on Leica.

Besides a technical mastery of the camera and a highly-honed sense of aesthetics, Chan also possesses the precious ability to adapt to any situation.

He recounts his recent experience in Sydney: “It was the first time I was shooting in Sydney’s winter and the weather changed every two minutes. It went from cloudy to sunny, or you’d have a perfect blue sky with a dark cloud in the middle. So, I improvised according to the weather conditions,” he says.

On his foray into wedding photography — he is most famous for having shot singer Siti Nurhaliza’s wedding — he says it was a happy accident.

“I first started out doing corporate jobs. I went into wedding photography by accident, when I was asked by a friend to shoot a Malay wedding. One thing led to another and soon I found myself doing lots of wedding photography too.”

The studio he was with was initially called Portrait One; its name then changed to Kid Chan Studio.

An astute observer of society and trends, Chan makes some pretty interesting observations when prodded.

“Couples who are getting married are often very anxious. I always tell them that anyone who is getting married must not expect a perfect wedding. They are only setting themselves up for disappointment.

“I point out to them that it is the little unexpected or anticipated things that make their wedding experience rich and poignant. My philosophy which I share with them is to take things easy and smile more — that is what a wedding is all about,” says Chan.

He is in such a privileged position to calm the nerves of newlyweds because, as he rightly says, “a wedding photographer is the “vendor” couples spend the most time with on their wedding day.”

As to why every couple should invest in a wedding photographer, the pragmatic Chan says frankly: “Photos last as long as the marriage. So much time and effort are put into a wedding and so preserving the wedding memories is worth its weight in gold. A wedding is part of one’s personal history.”

His observations of the nature of people who engage him are also rich.

“Lawyers usually sign the (wedding photography) contract the fastest”, because they know exactly what they want and they would have covered all their interests well in the contract.

Accountants, meanwhile, are the most careful but Chan loves accountants because he can talk about things like the photographs’ return on investment and amortisation with these money men and women.

It comes as no surprise then that a lot of his clients end up becoming his good friends.

That facility for numbers is also why Chan’s business is very successful. He has seven support staff and five photographers.

He concedes that aside from going out to shoot weddings with his trusted Leica, the bulk of his time is spent doing paperwork.

When not out on assignment or travelling, Chan, who is a doting father to two young daughters aged 31/2 and 11/2 years, spends his time with his family.

• Kid Chan was named one of “100 people you must know in Asia” by Malaysian Tatler magazine. He has taken portrait photographs of esteemed Malaysians like Bank Negara Malaysia Governor Tan Sri Dr Zeti Akhtar Aziz and Minister of Finance II Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop. Chan’s studio can be located online at www.kidchan.com.





Photo Critiques: A General Guide

11 08 2008

Source : res-qmedia.com/forum

Critiques: A General Guide

A. Technical aspects

1. Exposure – underexposed or overexposed?
If yes, any idea what caused it? And always try to give a suggestion on how to overcome the problem. Eg- should he/she meter another area (or use a different metering technique), or maybe set a different shutter speed/aperture or use the exposure compensation.

2. Sharpness/Focus
- Is the subject in focus? Is it sharp enough or it should be sharper? (There are some other varieties, for e.g soft focus is widely used too in portraits and landscape so dont confuse this with blurred photography due to handshake, etc)
- Do you think the focus should be somewhere else? If yes where and why?
- If the photograph isnt sharp are there any suggestions to improve it? For e.g, higher shutter speed or use of tripod.

3. Depth of field
The DOF shallow or wide? Which is more suitable in that photograph and what would you to improve it.

4. Lighting
Look at the photograph and see whether the lighting used is appropriate. Should there be more lighting or less? If it’s outdoor, is the lighting too harsh or too dark? Suggestions like choosing a better time of the day, use of reflectors to fill in the shadow, using fill-flash can be stated.

5. White balance in digital photography
Do you think that the white balance is set correctly? Is there a colour cast in the photo?

6. Post processing
- The use of Photoshop and other similar software.
- In this area, you can suggest some post processing technique to improve the photograph. For e.g, using Unsharp Mask (USM) to help sharpen the image, or converting the photography to greyscale (B&W) to give better mood, etc.

B. Composition

1. Subject position
- in the center or the used of Rule of Thirds. Or is the subject somewhere else in the frame. Do you think the composition worked? Or is there a better placement of the subject in your opinion.

2. Converging or leading lines
- Did the photographer include any of these? If he/she didnt, is there elements in the photograph that the photographer can use to give a better impact?

3. Cropping and framing
- So is the photo cropped/framed properly? Are there distracting elements in the photograph? Similarly, is there an element which is cropped off that shouldnt be.

4. Overall
- what other suggestions do you have regarding the composition? For e.g should the photographer include more space around the subject or crop off the extra space? Is the scene too busy, or too empty?

C. The aesthetic/artistic impact

This area is pretty much subjective. Aesthetically/artistically different photographs affect different individuals. Some may get offended on certain genre of photography while other enjoy it. Try to have an open mind while dealing with this area of photography.

1. Mood
- So anyway, the first question would be “How does the photograph make you feel?” What kind of mood did you interpret from the photograph? Do you think that the mood is what the photographer wants to convey?

2. Story
- so does the photograph have one? If no, what suggestions you have that can give a better story? You can link the suggestions with the technical side of it, like composition, lighting, DOF, etc.

3. Overall
- do you like the photo and do you think it has an impact? If yes, why and if no why?

All these information would greatly help the photographer to improve on his/her work. Critiquing doesnt only help the photographer, it also help the critic, i.e you. It lets your mind work on the scene and when you are in that same situation, you’ll find that you will use the same advice you have given. It’s like some sort of a practice in your head.

Another thing, do not be afraid to voice out your honest opinions in the critique, eventhough you are only a beginner commenting on a professional’s photograph. But remain polite and try not to get offensive in your critiques. We are all here to learn and giving out honest opinions will help us to improve. There is no point on simply saying “Great shot, very nice colours” and not explaining more.

Similarly, when receiving critiques on your photograph, try to have an open mind and think about what the critic wrote. Dont get so easily upset on a harsh critique and out of anger, reply some useless comment. If there is any clarification, reply back politely and ask for a better explanation rather than initiate an argument. If you were looking for help in a particular aspect, for e.g lighting, state so in the comments section when you post the photograph. Adding technical details and how you went about taking the photograph will not only help the critic to understand your photo better but is also a good way for members to learn some techniques from you.

Zoomer : Panduan untuk mengkritik seperti di atas amat baik untuk dijadikan panduan pada yang mahu mengkritik hasilkerja sendiri, mahupun hasilkerja fotografer lain. Kadang waktu bila kita sudah memiliki sedikit ilmu, kita selalu merasa ingin memberikan pendapat tentang sesuatu yang menarik yang kita lihat. Namun dalam banyak keadaan mungkin cara kita kurang sesuai, yang mana akhirnya pemilik karya akan merasa tersinggung atas pendapat atau teguran atau kritik yang diterima. Sudahnya kedua-dua pihak tanpa disedari terjebak dalam konflik dan perdebatan yang semata-mata bertunjangkan emosi. Kesudahannya perbincangan yang sepatutnya menghala kepada percambahan ilmu diakhiri dengan permusuhan yang memualkan. Sedihnya situasi begini kerap terlihat di kalangan peminat fotografi di negara kita kebelakangan ini. Ada baiknya panduan di atas kita renungkan dan kita jadikan asas dalam apa juga bentuk pebincangan dan perbahasan demi faedah kita bersama.